Surveyor Findings Register & Consistency Validation

Pure derived findings view generated dynamically from committed surveyor ratings and on-site tracer observations.

Critical Findings
1

Mandatory Core criterion breaches blocking award

High / Medium OFIs
112

Opportunities for Quality Improvement

Reasoned Divergences
23

Hospital vs Surveyor split ledger variances

Consistency Checks
3 / 6

3 rule flagged

Derived Findings & Areas for Improvement

493 Total
1.2.7.1
CORE
Workforce Physical, Mental and Spiritual Wellbeing
Critical Risk
Self: met → Surv: notmet

During Tracer 3 interview with Head of Human Resources (Pn. Aishah Kamal), the person in charge was unable to explain workforce wellbeing indicator PI-01-019, stating she was unaware it had been assigned to her. The only evidence submitted is an informal employee assistance informational leaflet (scoring 22 on quality review). There is no approved workforce wellbeing policy, no documented mental health surveillance, no budget allocation, and no operationalized tracking.

Basis for Divergence:

The hospital self-rated Fully Met on 14 January 2026 based on an informal employee assistance leaflet. Surveyor assessment identified that no approved policy, budget allocation or active surveillance exists, and the designated Person in Charge could not explain the indicator during on-site tracer challenge.

Recommendation:Establish a comprehensive, approved workforce wellbeing policy and operationalized programme with trained personnel and active indicator monitoring.
2.2.8Medical Gas Pipeline System Redundancy and Safety
High Risk
Self: notmet → Surv: notmet

The hospital transparently self-identified and reported that the secondary medical gas manifold auto-changeover valve failed pressure integrity testing during the pre-survey engineering audit. The replacement component is on order but not yet commissioned.

Recommendation:Complete installation and validation of the secondary manifold changeover valve with urgency.
01.4.3.25Strategic Leadership Protocol 4.3
High Risk
Self: notmet → Surv: notmet

Surveyor assessment revealed complete absence of structured monitoring logs and verified staff competency assessments for strategic leadership in Governance, Leadership and Direction.

Recommendation:Develop mandatory SOP, assign operational indicator oversight, and conduct staff training within 60 days.
05.4.3.25Shift Handover Protocol 4.3
High Risk
Self: notmet → Surv: notmet

Surveyor assessment revealed complete absence of structured monitoring logs and verified staff competency assessments for shift handover in Nursing Services.

Recommendation:Develop mandatory SOP, assign operational indicator oversight, and conduct staff training within 60 days.
06.4.3.25Environmental Cleanliness Protocol 4.3
High Risk
Self: notmet → Surv: notmet

Surveyor assessment revealed complete absence of structured monitoring logs and verified staff competency assessments for environmental cleanliness in Prevention and Control of Infection.

Recommendation:Develop mandatory SOP, assign operational indicator oversight, and conduct staff training within 60 days.
09A.4.3.25Discharge Planning Protocol 4.3
High Risk
Self: notmet → Surv: notmet

Surveyor assessment revealed complete absence of structured monitoring logs and verified staff competency assessments for discharge planning in General Medical Services.

Recommendation:Develop mandatory SOP, assign operational indicator oversight, and conduct staff training within 60 days.
Standard 09AOpen Split Ledger
09B.4.3.25Tissue Audit Protocol 4.3
High Risk
Self: notmet → Surv: notmet

Surveyor assessment revealed complete absence of structured monitoring logs and verified staff competency assessments for tissue audit in General Surgical Services.

Recommendation:Develop mandatory SOP, assign operational indicator oversight, and conduct staff training within 60 days.
Standard 09BOpen Split Ledger
09D.4.3.25Growth Monitoring Protocol 4.3
High Risk
Self: met → Surv: notmet

Surveyor assessment revealed complete absence of structured monitoring logs and verified staff competency assessments for growth monitoring in Paediatric Services.

Basis for Divergence:

The hospital self-rated Fully Met, but surveyor on-site audit found no evidence of approved policy implementation, active tracking, or staff competency verification for growth monitoring in Paediatric Services.

Recommendation:Develop mandatory SOP, assign operational indicator oversight, and conduct staff training within 60 days.
Standard 09DOpen Split Ledger
09E.4.3.25Surgical Infection Control Protocol 4.3
High Risk
Self: notmet → Surv: notmet

Surveyor assessment revealed complete absence of structured monitoring logs and verified staff competency assessments for surgical infection control in Orthopaedic Services.

Recommendation:Develop mandatory SOP, assign operational indicator oversight, and conduct staff training within 60 days.
Standard 09EOpen Split Ledger
14.1.3.13Trauma Team Activation Protocol 1.3
High Risk
Self: notmet → Surv: notmet

Surveyor assessment revealed complete absence of structured monitoring logs and verified staff competency assessments for trauma team activation in Emergency Medical and Trauma Services.

Recommendation:Develop mandatory SOP, assign operational indicator oversight, and conduct staff training within 60 days.
17A.2.2.16Physiotherapy Assessment Protocol 2.2
High Risk
Self: notmet → Surv: notmet

On-site tracer identified that physiotherapy assessment procedures in Physiotherapy Services are not operationalized. Required audit records and surveillance evidence could not be produced.

Recommendation:Develop mandatory SOP, assign operational indicator oversight, and conduct staff training within 60 days.
Standard 17AOpen Split Ledger
17B.2.3.17Activities of Daily Living Protocol 2.3
High Risk
Self: notmet → Surv: notmet

Surveyor assessment revealed complete absence of structured monitoring logs and verified staff competency assessments for activities of daily living in Occupational Therapy Services.

Recommendation:Develop mandatory SOP, assign operational indicator oversight, and conduct staff training within 60 days.
Standard 17BOpen Split Ledger
19.3.1.19Image Quality Assurance Protocol 3.1
High Risk
Self: notmet → Surv: notmet

Surveyor assessment revealed complete absence of structured monitoring logs and verified staff competency assessments for image quality assurance in Diagnostic Imaging Services.

Recommendation:Develop mandatory SOP, assign operational indicator oversight, and conduct staff training within 60 days.
20.3.2.20Blood Bank Compatibility Protocol 3.2
High Risk
Self: notmet → Surv: notmet

On-site tracer identified that blood bank compatibility procedures in Pathology and Clinical Laboratory Services are not operationalized. Required audit records and surveillance evidence could not be produced.

Recommendation:Develop mandatory SOP, assign operational indicator oversight, and conduct staff training within 60 days.
21.3.3.21Infectious Linen Segregation Protocol 3.3
High Risk
Self: notmet → Surv: notmet

Surveyor assessment revealed complete absence of structured monitoring logs and verified staff competency assessments for infectious linen segregation in Linen and Laundry Services.

Recommendation:Develop mandatory SOP, assign operational indicator oversight, and conduct staff training within 60 days.
1.1.3.10Information Technology Continuity and Cyber Resilience
Medium Risk
Self: met → Surv: partial

The IT disaster recovery documentation is comprehensive and daily off-site backups are performed. However, the last simulated full failover drill for the clinical EMR system was conducted over 18 months ago, exceeding annual policy requirements.

Basis for Divergence:

The hospital self-assessed as Fully Met based on off-site backup logs, but compliance criteria explicitly mandate an annual simulated failover drill which has not been completed within the past 12 months.

Recommendation:Conduct simulated IT disaster recovery drill and document failover recovery time objectives.
6.1.13.1
SAFETY
Environmental Cleaning and Disinfection Surveillance
Medium Risk
Self: met → Surv: partial

Environmental cleaning SOPs and ATP surface testing are implemented. However, audit records in High Dependency Unit showed that environmental swabbing was omitted for two consecutive months in Q4 2025 due to reagent shortages.

Basis for Divergence:

The hospital self-assessed as Fully Met based on current Q1 2026 records, but historical documentation reveals a two-month audit gap in Q4 2025 in acute areas that was not formally rectified with compensatory testing.

Recommendation:Maintain uninterrupted environmental cleaning validation audits across all acute care units.
8.6.1Clinical Record Quality Audits and Quantitative Timeliness
Medium Risk
Self: met → Surv: partial

Monthly medical record audits are performed. However, audit results for Q4 2025 indicated that discharge summary completion within 48 hours in General Surgery achieved only 84.2% compliance against the 95% hospital benchmark.

Basis for Divergence:

The hospital self-rated Fully Met on 22 January 2026, but the documentation audit register shows discharge summary timeliness fell below the 95% target in surgical wards throughout the evaluated audit period.

Recommendation:Strengthen monitoring and enforcement of the 48-hour discharge summary completion standard.
01.1.4.14Statutory Compliance Protocol 1.4
Medium Risk
Self: met → Surv: partial

Audit of Governance, Leadership and Direction logs revealed intermittent documentation for statutory compliance, with sampled shift handover records missing mandatory supervisory sign-offs.

Basis for Divergence:

Self-assessment claimed full compliance; however, surveyor tracer observed inconsistent operational execution of statutory compliance protocols across departmental shifts.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
01.2.1.15Workforce Welfare Protocol 2.1
Medium Risk
Self: met → Surv: partial

Staff interviews during tracer challenge indicated uneven adherence to workforce welfare protocols during weekend coverage, despite available departmental guidelines.

Basis for Divergence:

Hospital self-rated Met based on departmental SOP existence, but on-site surveyor inspection revealed gaps in active surveillance and incomplete corrective actions for workforce welfare.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
01.2.2.16Data Ethics Protocol 2.2
Medium Risk
Self: met → Surv: partial

Review of data ethics monitoring files in Governance, Leadership and Direction identified overdue quarterly audits and incomplete corrective action verification.

Basis for Divergence:

The hospital self-rated Fully Met on preliminary procedural draft, but surveyor audit of on-site records in Governance, Leadership and Direction identified intermittent supervisory sign-offs and missing audit follow-ups for data ethics.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
01.3.4.22Data Ethics Protocol 3.4
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Audit of Governance, Leadership and Direction logs revealed intermittent documentation for data ethics, with sampled shift handover records missing mandatory supervisory sign-offs.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
02.2.1.15Facility Protection Protocol 2.1
Medium Risk
Self: met → Surv: partial

Staff interviews during tracer challenge indicated uneven adherence to facility protection protocols during weekend coverage, despite available departmental guidelines.

Basis for Divergence:

Hospital self-rated Met based on departmental SOP existence, but on-site surveyor inspection revealed gaps in active surveillance and incomplete corrective actions for facility protection.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
03.1.4.14Structural Maintenance Protocol 1.4
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Audit of Facility Management and Safety logs revealed intermittent documentation for structural maintenance, with sampled shift handover records missing mandatory supervisory sign-offs.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
03.2.2.16Plant Operations Protocol 2.2
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Review of plant operations monitoring files in Facility Management and Safety identified overdue quarterly audits and incomplete corrective action verification.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
03.2.3.17Physical Infrastructure Protocol 2.3
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Departmental surveillance for physical infrastructure lacks continuous trend analysis and formal closure evidence on identified non-conformances.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
03.3.3.21Plant Operations Protocol 3.3
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Departmental surveillance for plant operations lacks continuous trend analysis and formal closure evidence on identified non-conformances.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
03.4.1.23Utility Redundancy Protocol 4.1
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Staff interviews during tracer challenge indicated uneven adherence to utility redundancy protocols during weekend coverage, despite available departmental guidelines.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
04.3.3.21Biomedical Maintenance Protocol 3.3
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Departmental surveillance for biomedical maintenance lacks continuous trend analysis and formal closure evidence on identified non-conformances.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
04.4.1.23Device Lifecycle Protocol 4.1
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Staff interviews during tracer challenge indicated uneven adherence to device lifecycle protocols during weekend coverage, despite available departmental guidelines.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
04.4.2.24Safety Alert Execution Protocol 4.2
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Review of safety alert execution monitoring files in Biomedical Engineering Services identified overdue quarterly audits and incomplete corrective action verification.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
05.1.2.12Clinical Documentation Protocol 1.2
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Review of clinical documentation monitoring files in Nursing Services identified overdue quarterly audits and incomplete corrective action verification.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
06.2.1.15Environmental Cleanliness Protocol 2.1
Medium Risk
Self: met → Surv: partial

Staff interviews during tracer challenge indicated uneven adherence to environmental cleanliness protocols during weekend coverage, despite available departmental guidelines.

Basis for Divergence:

Hospital self-rated Met based on departmental SOP existence, but on-site surveyor inspection revealed gaps in active surveillance and incomplete corrective actions for environmental cleanliness.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
07.1.2.12
CORE
Patient Dignity Protocol 1.2
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Review of patient dignity monitoring files in Patient and Family Rights identified overdue quarterly audits and incomplete corrective action verification.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
07.2.4.18Feedback Resolution Protocol 2.4
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Audit of Patient and Family Rights logs revealed intermittent documentation for feedback resolution, with sampled shift handover records missing mandatory supervisory sign-offs.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
07.3.1.19Vulnerable Patient Protection Protocol 3.1
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Staff interviews during tracer challenge indicated uneven adherence to vulnerable patient protection protocols during weekend coverage, despite available departmental guidelines.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
07.4.1.23Feedback Resolution Protocol 4.1
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Staff interviews during tracer challenge indicated uneven adherence to feedback resolution protocols during weekend coverage, despite available departmental guidelines.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
08.2.2.16Medical Records Storage Protocol 2.2
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Review of medical records storage monitoring files in Health Information and Medical Records identified overdue quarterly audits and incomplete corrective action verification.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
08.4.1.23EMR Access Controls Protocol 4.1
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Staff interviews during tracer challenge indicated uneven adherence to emr access controls protocols during weekend coverage, despite available departmental guidelines.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
09A.3.1.19Diagnostic Pathways Protocol 3.1
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Staff interviews during tracer challenge indicated uneven adherence to diagnostic pathways protocols during weekend coverage, despite available departmental guidelines.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
Standard 09AOpen Split Ledger
09A.3.2.20Discharge Planning Protocol 3.2
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Review of discharge planning monitoring files in General Medical Services identified overdue quarterly audits and incomplete corrective action verification.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
Standard 09AOpen Split Ledger
09A.4.2.24Diagnostic Pathways Protocol 4.2
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Review of diagnostic pathways monitoring files in General Medical Services identified overdue quarterly audits and incomplete corrective action verification.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
Standard 09AOpen Split Ledger
09B.4.2.24Surgical Safety Checklist Protocol 4.2
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Review of surgical safety checklist monitoring files in General Surgical Services identified overdue quarterly audits and incomplete corrective action verification.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
Standard 09BOpen Split Ledger
09C.1.2.12Antenatal Assessment Protocol 1.2
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Review of antenatal assessment monitoring files in Obstetric and Gynaecological Services identified overdue quarterly audits and incomplete corrective action verification.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
Standard 09COpen Split Ledger
09C.1.4.14Postnatal Monitoring Protocol 1.4
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Audit of Obstetric and Gynaecological Services logs revealed intermittent documentation for postnatal monitoring, with sampled shift handover records missing mandatory supervisory sign-offs.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
Standard 09COpen Split Ledger
09C.2.4.18Intrapartum Care Protocol 2.4
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Audit of Obstetric and Gynaecological Services logs revealed intermittent documentation for intrapartum care, with sampled shift handover records missing mandatory supervisory sign-offs.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
Standard 09COpen Split Ledger
09C.4.2.24Postnatal Monitoring Protocol 4.2
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Review of postnatal monitoring monitoring files in Obstetric and Gynaecological Services identified overdue quarterly audits and incomplete corrective action verification.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
Standard 09COpen Split Ledger
09D.1.1.11Paediatric Inpatient Care Protocol 1.1
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Staff interviews during tracer challenge indicated uneven adherence to paediatric inpatient care protocols during weekend coverage, despite available departmental guidelines.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
Standard 09DOpen Split Ledger
09D.1.3.13Neonatal Resuscitation Protocol 1.3
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Departmental surveillance for neonatal resuscitation lacks continuous trend analysis and formal closure evidence on identified non-conformances.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
Standard 09DOpen Split Ledger
09D.3.1.19Child Safety Safeguards Protocol 3.1
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Staff interviews during tracer challenge indicated uneven adherence to child safety safeguards protocols during weekend coverage, despite available departmental guidelines.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
Standard 09DOpen Split Ledger
09D.3.3.21Paediatric Inpatient Care Protocol 3.3
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Departmental surveillance for paediatric inpatient care lacks continuous trend analysis and formal closure evidence on identified non-conformances.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
Standard 09DOpen Split Ledger
09E.1.2.12Fracture Management Protocol 1.2
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Review of fracture management monitoring files in Orthopaedic Services identified overdue quarterly audits and incomplete corrective action verification.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
Standard 09EOpen Split Ledger
09E.1.3.13Implant Traceability Protocol 1.3
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Departmental surveillance for implant traceability lacks continuous trend analysis and formal closure evidence on identified non-conformances.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
Standard 09EOpen Split Ledger
09E.1.4.14
CORE
Rehabilitation Integration Protocol 1.4
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Audit of Orthopaedic Services logs revealed intermittent documentation for rehabilitation integration, with sampled shift handover records missing mandatory supervisory sign-offs.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
Standard 09EOpen Split Ledger
09E.2.2.16Orthopaedic Procedures Protocol 2.2
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Review of orthopaedic procedures monitoring files in Orthopaedic Services identified overdue quarterly audits and incomplete corrective action verification.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
Standard 09EOpen Split Ledger
09E.2.3.17Fracture Management Protocol 2.3
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Departmental surveillance for fracture management lacks continuous trend analysis and formal closure evidence on identified non-conformances.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
Standard 09EOpen Split Ledger
09E.3.2.20Surgical Infection Control Protocol 3.2
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Review of surgical infection control monitoring files in Orthopaedic Services identified overdue quarterly audits and incomplete corrective action verification.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
Standard 09EOpen Split Ledger
09E.3.4.22Fracture Management Protocol 3.4
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Audit of Orthopaedic Services logs revealed intermittent documentation for fracture management, with sampled shift handover records missing mandatory supervisory sign-offs.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
Standard 09EOpen Split Ledger
09F.1.1.11Anaesthetic Pre-assessment Protocol 1.1
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Staff interviews during tracer challenge indicated uneven adherence to anaesthetic pre-assessment protocols during weekend coverage, despite available departmental guidelines.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
Standard 09FOpen Split Ledger
09F.2.3.17Intra-operative Monitoring Protocol 2.3
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Departmental surveillance for intra-operative monitoring lacks continuous trend analysis and formal closure evidence on identified non-conformances.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
Standard 09FOpen Split Ledger
09F.4.1.23PACU Recovery Care Protocol 4.1
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Staff interviews during tracer challenge indicated uneven adherence to pacu recovery care protocols during weekend coverage, despite available departmental guidelines.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
Standard 09FOpen Split Ledger
10.1.1.11Operating Theatre Zoning Protocol 1.1
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Staff interviews during tracer challenge indicated uneven adherence to operating theatre zoning protocols during weekend coverage, despite available departmental guidelines.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
10.2.2.16Operating Theatre Zoning Protocol 2.2
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Review of operating theatre zoning monitoring files in Operating Suite Services identified overdue quarterly audits and incomplete corrective action verification.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
10.2.3.17Surgical Scheduling Protocol 2.3
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Departmental surveillance for surgical scheduling lacks continuous trend analysis and formal closure evidence on identified non-conformances.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
10.4.2.24Sterility Assurance Protocol 4.2
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Review of sterility assurance monitoring files in Operating Suite Services identified overdue quarterly audits and incomplete corrective action verification.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
11.2.3.17Outpatient Consultation Protocol 2.3
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Departmental surveillance for outpatient consultation lacks continuous trend analysis and formal closure evidence on identified non-conformances.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
11.3.2.20Patient Education Protocol 3.2
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Review of patient education monitoring files in Ambulatory Care Services identified overdue quarterly audits and incomplete corrective action verification.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
12A.1.2.12Ventilator Care Bundles Protocol 1.2
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Review of ventilator care bundles monitoring files in Critical Care Services - General / ICU identified overdue quarterly audits and incomplete corrective action verification.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
Standard 12AOpen Split Ledger
12A.4.1.23Central Line Safety Protocol 4.1
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Staff interviews during tracer challenge indicated uneven adherence to central line safety protocols during weekend coverage, despite available departmental guidelines.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
Standard 12AOpen Split Ledger
12A.4.2.24
CORE
Intensive Resuscitation Protocol 4.2
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Review of intensive resuscitation monitoring files in Critical Care Services - General / ICU identified overdue quarterly audits and incomplete corrective action verification.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
Standard 12AOpen Split Ledger
13.1.4.14Newborn Delivery Protocol Protocol 1.4
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Audit of Labour Delivery Services logs revealed intermittent documentation for newborn delivery protocol, with sampled shift handover records missing mandatory supervisory sign-offs.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
13.2.1.15Birthing Room Hygiene Protocol 2.1
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Staff interviews during tracer challenge indicated uneven adherence to birthing room hygiene protocols during weekend coverage, despite available departmental guidelines.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
13.2.4.18Obstetric Emergency Response Protocol 2.4
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Audit of Labour Delivery Services logs revealed intermittent documentation for obstetric emergency response, with sampled shift handover records missing mandatory supervisory sign-offs.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
13.3.2.20Birthing Room Hygiene Protocol 3.2
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Review of birthing room hygiene monitoring files in Labour Delivery Services identified overdue quarterly audits and incomplete corrective action verification.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
13.4.1.23Obstetric Emergency Response Protocol 4.1
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Staff interviews during tracer challenge indicated uneven adherence to obstetric emergency response protocols during weekend coverage, despite available departmental guidelines.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
14.1.2.12Resuscitation Protocols Protocol 1.2
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Review of resuscitation protocols monitoring files in Emergency Medical and Trauma Services identified overdue quarterly audits and incomplete corrective action verification.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
14.1.4.14Ambulance Reception Protocol 1.4
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Audit of Emergency Medical and Trauma Services logs revealed intermittent documentation for ambulance reception, with sampled shift handover records missing mandatory supervisory sign-offs.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
14.2.2.16Emergency Triage System Protocol 2.2
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Review of emergency triage system monitoring files in Emergency Medical and Trauma Services identified overdue quarterly audits and incomplete corrective action verification.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
14.3.3.21Emergency Triage System Protocol 3.3
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Departmental surveillance for emergency triage system lacks continuous trend analysis and formal closure evidence on identified non-conformances.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
16.1.1.11Decontamination Processing Protocol 1.1
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Staff interviews during tracer challenge indicated uneven adherence to decontamination processing protocols during weekend coverage, despite available departmental guidelines.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
16.2.4.18Sterilisation Batch Release Protocol 2.4
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Audit of Central Sterile Supply Services (CSSD) logs revealed intermittent documentation for sterilisation batch release, with sampled shift handover records missing mandatory supervisory sign-offs.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
16.3.1.19Instrument Tracking Protocol 3.1
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Staff interviews during tracer challenge indicated uneven adherence to instrument tracking protocols during weekend coverage, despite available departmental guidelines.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
17A.1.4.14Chest Physiotherapy Protocol 1.4
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Audit of Physiotherapy Services logs revealed intermittent documentation for chest physiotherapy, with sampled shift handover records missing mandatory supervisory sign-offs.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
Standard 17AOpen Split Ledger
17A.3.2.20Patient Progress Tracking Protocol 3.2
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Review of patient progress tracking monitoring files in Physiotherapy Services identified overdue quarterly audits and incomplete corrective action verification.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
Standard 17AOpen Split Ledger
17A.3.3.21Physiotherapy Assessment Protocol 3.3
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Departmental surveillance for physiotherapy assessment lacks continuous trend analysis and formal closure evidence on identified non-conformances.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
Standard 17AOpen Split Ledger
17B.3.1.19Splinting Services Protocol 3.1
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Staff interviews during tracer challenge indicated uneven adherence to splinting services protocols during weekend coverage, despite available departmental guidelines.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
Standard 17BOpen Split Ledger
17B.3.2.20Ergonomic Evaluation Protocol 3.2
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Review of ergonomic evaluation monitoring files in Occupational Therapy Services identified overdue quarterly audits and incomplete corrective action verification.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
Standard 17BOpen Split Ledger
18.1.2.12Formulary Management Protocol 1.2
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Review of formulary management monitoring files in Pharmacy Services identified overdue quarterly audits and incomplete corrective action verification.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
18.1.4.14High-Alert Drug Storage Protocol 1.4
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Audit of Pharmacy Services logs revealed intermittent documentation for high-alert drug storage, with sampled shift handover records missing mandatory supervisory sign-offs.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
18.2.1.15Patient Counselling Protocol 2.1
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Staff interviews during tracer challenge indicated uneven adherence to patient counselling protocols during weekend coverage, despite available departmental guidelines.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
18.3.1.19High-Alert Drug Storage Protocol 3.1
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Staff interviews during tracer challenge indicated uneven adherence to high-alert drug storage protocols during weekend coverage, despite available departmental guidelines.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
18.3.2.20Patient Counselling Protocol 3.2
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Review of patient counselling monitoring files in Pharmacy Services identified overdue quarterly audits and incomplete corrective action verification.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
18.4.1.23Cold Chain Assurance Protocol 4.1
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Staff interviews during tracer challenge indicated uneven adherence to cold chain assurance protocols during weekend coverage, despite available departmental guidelines.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
19.1.4.14Image Quality Assurance Protocol 1.4
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Audit of Diagnostic Imaging Services logs revealed intermittent documentation for image quality assurance, with sampled shift handover records missing mandatory supervisory sign-offs.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
19.2.3.17Imaging Turnaround Time Protocol 2.3
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Departmental surveillance for imaging turnaround time lacks continuous trend analysis and formal closure evidence on identified non-conformances.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
19.3.3.21Diagnostic Radiation Safety Protocol 3.3
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Departmental surveillance for diagnostic radiation safety lacks continuous trend analysis and formal closure evidence on identified non-conformances.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
20.1.2.12Internal Quality Control Protocol 1.2
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Review of internal quality control monitoring files in Pathology and Clinical Laboratory Services identified overdue quarterly audits and incomplete corrective action verification.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
20.1.3.13
CORE
External Quality Assessment Protocol 1.3
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Departmental surveillance for external quality assessment lacks continuous trend analysis and formal closure evidence on identified non-conformances.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
20.2.4.18External Quality Assessment Protocol 2.4
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Audit of Pathology and Clinical Laboratory Services logs revealed intermittent documentation for external quality assessment, with sampled shift handover records missing mandatory supervisory sign-offs.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
21.2.3.17Thermal Disinfection Washing Protocol 2.3
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Departmental surveillance for thermal disinfection washing lacks continuous trend analysis and formal closure evidence on identified non-conformances.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
21.3.1.19Textile Integrity Audit Protocol 3.1
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Staff interviews during tracer challenge indicated uneven adherence to textile integrity audit protocols during weekend coverage, despite available departmental guidelines.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
22.1.4.14Biohazard Clean-up Protocol 1.4
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Audit of Housekeeping and Cleaning Services logs revealed intermittent documentation for biohazard clean-up, with sampled shift handover records missing mandatory supervisory sign-offs.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
22.2.1.15Sanitation Inspection Protocol 2.1
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Staff interviews during tracer challenge indicated uneven adherence to sanitation inspection protocols during weekend coverage, despite available departmental guidelines.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
22.2.3.17Disinfectant Dilution Protocol 2.3
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Departmental surveillance for disinfectant dilution lacks continuous trend analysis and formal closure evidence on identified non-conformances.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
22.4.1.23Terminal Ward Discharge Protocol 4.1
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Staff interviews during tracer challenge indicated uneven adherence to terminal ward discharge protocols during weekend coverage, despite available departmental guidelines.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
23A.1.1.11Deceased Identification Protocol 1.1
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Staff interviews during tracer challenge indicated uneven adherence to deceased identification protocols during weekend coverage, despite available departmental guidelines.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
Standard 23AOpen Split Ledger
23A.2.1.15Bereavement Support Protocol 2.1
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Staff interviews during tracer challenge indicated uneven adherence to bereavement support protocols during weekend coverage, despite available departmental guidelines.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
Standard 23AOpen Split Ledger
23A.4.2.24Infectious Remains Handling Protocol 4.2
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Review of infectious remains handling monitoring files in Mortuary Services identified overdue quarterly audits and incomplete corrective action verification.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
Standard 23AOpen Split Ledger
24.4.1.23Procurement Oversight Protocol 4.1
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Staff interviews during tracer challenge indicated uneven adherence to procurement oversight protocols during weekend coverage, despite available departmental guidelines.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
25.2.3.17Crossmatch Verification Protocol 2.3
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Departmental surveillance for crossmatch verification lacks continuous trend analysis and formal closure evidence on identified non-conformances.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
25.3.1.19
CORE
Cold Chain Transport Protocol 3.1
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Staff interviews during tracer challenge indicated uneven adherence to cold chain transport protocols during weekend coverage, despite available departmental guidelines.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
25.3.4.22
CORE
Crossmatch Verification Protocol 3.4
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Audit of Blood Transfusion Services logs revealed intermittent documentation for crossmatch verification, with sampled shift handover records missing mandatory supervisory sign-offs.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
25.4.1.23
CORE
Transfusion Reaction Protocol Protocol 4.1
Medium Risk
Self: partial → Surv: partial

Staff interviews during tracer challenge indicated uneven adherence to transfusion reaction protocol protocols during weekend coverage, despite available departmental guidelines.

Recommendation:Implement monthly documentation audits and review adherence rates during departmental quality meetings.
1.1.1.1
CORE
Vision, Mission and Core Values
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

The strategic plan and core values are approved by the Board and well understood by staff interviewed across acute wards. Vision and mission statements are prominently displayed.

Recommendation:Maintain annual strategic milestone review cycles.
1.1.2.1
CORE
Organisational and Committee Structure
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Organizational hierarchy is clearly structured. Committee terms of reference and meeting minutes demonstrate effective clinical and administrative governance oversight.

Recommendation:Continue regular committee governance reviews.
1.1.3.1
CORE
Statutory Licences and Compliance
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Statutory licences including Act 586 licence, Fire Certificate and AELB authorizations are valid and displayed. Compliance registers are properly maintained.

Recommendation:Sustain proactive statutory licence renewal tracking.
1.2.1.1Human Resource Planning and Staff Establishment
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Staffing establishment norms are well maintained in critical care and inpatient wards. Surge staffing contingency procedures are documented and functional.

Recommendation:Continue quarterly staffing establishment reviews.
1.2.2.1
CORE
SAFETY
Credentialing and Privileging of Medical Practitioners
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Primary source verification of medical credentials and NSR certifications is thorough. Privilege delineation forms are signed, current and accessible in clinical areas.

Recommendation:Ensure visiting consultant files maintain identical primary verification depth.
1.2.4.1Staff Continuous Professional Development and Training
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Continuing professional development records verify high staff attendance for CPR, infection control and fire safety mandatory training modules.

Recommendation:Continue structured hospital-wide CPD programme.
2.1.1
CORE
SAFETY
Occupational Safety and Health Programme
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

OSH Committee functions effectively in compliance with OSHA 1994. Workplace hazard inspections and needle-stick surveillance registers are diligently maintained.

Recommendation:Maintain proactive OSH hazard surveillance.
2.1.4
SAFETY
Hazardous Materials and Waste Management
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Chemical reagents and hazardous clinical waste are stored appropriately with current Safety Data Sheets and licensed disposal manifests.

Recommendation:Sustain rigorous chemical management practices.
2.2.1
CORE
SAFETY
Fire Safety Management and Evacuation Preparedness
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Fire detection, alarm and suppression systems are certified by Bomba. Fire evacuation routes are unobstructed with well-documented bi-annual drill critique records.

Recommendation:Maintain high fire safety standards.
2.2.3
SAFETY
Disaster and Mass Casualty Management Plan
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Mass casualty disaster plan is comprehensive with clear triage protocols. Multi-agency simulation drill demonstrated coordinated inter-departmental response.

Recommendation:Continue annual disaster simulation exercises.
4.1.1Biomedical Equipment Inventory and Management System
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Biomedical equipment inventory is well structured with risk categories assigned and unique asset barcodes on all inspected devices.

Recommendation:Maintain rigorous asset inventory controls.
4.1.3
CORE
SAFETY
Planned Preventive Maintenance (PPM) of Medical Equipment
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

PPM adherence is high with 97.2% completion rate. Physical inspection of defibrillators, ventilators and infusion pumps confirmed valid PPM calibration stickers.

Recommendation:Continue excellent preventive maintenance standards.
4.2.1Corrective Maintenance and Breakdown Response
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Breakdown repair ticketing system demonstrates prompt response times and thorough post-repair safety sign-offs prior to clinical release.

Recommendation:Sustain rapid corrective maintenance turnaround.
4.3.1Medical Device Safety Alerts and Recall Management
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Medical Device Authority hazard alerts and product recalls are handled systematically with clear evidence of device quarantine and vendor remediation.

Recommendation:Maintain prompt execution of device safety alerts.
5.1.1
CORE
Nursing Administration and Leadership
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Nursing leadership provides strong clinical governance. Annual Practising Certificates are verified for 100% of nursing staff on duty.

Recommendation:Maintain robust nursing leadership governance.
5.1.3
CORE
Nursing Care Assessment and Care Planning
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Admission nursing assessments sampled across 12 inpatient files were completed within 2 hours with individualized care plans in place.

Recommendation:Sustain high-quality admission nursing assessments.
5.2.1
CORE
SAFETY
Safe Medication Administration by Nurses
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Medication administration observation in ICU and Paediatric ward confirmed adherence to the 7 Rights and independent double-checks for high-alert drugs.

Recommendation:Maintain vigilant medication safety practices.
5.2.3
SAFETY
Clinical Handover and Structured SBAR Communication
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Observed nursing shift handover in Male Surgical Ward followed standardized SBAR methodology with active bedside involvement and clear critical task handoffs.

Recommendation:Continue structured SBAR handover practices.
5.3.1Patient Fall Prevention and Management
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inpatient fall prevention protocols are implemented with Morse risk screening on admission. Yellow fall risk wristbands and low beds are used appropriately.

Recommendation:Maintain comprehensive multidisciplinary fall prevention strategies.
6.1.1
CORE
SAFETY
Infection Control Committee and Governance
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Infection Control Committee meets regularly with active multidisciplinary attendance. Surveillance data is analyzed effectively and reported to hospital leadership.

Recommendation:Continue proactive infection control governance.
6.1.4
CORE
SAFETY
Standard Precautions and Hand Hygiene Compliance
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Hand hygiene compliance audits show sustained adherence exceeding the 85% target. Hand rub dispensers are plentiful and well-maintained at point of care.

Recommendation:Maintain rigorous hand hygiene monitoring.
6.1.7
CORE
SAFETY
Healthcare-Associated Infection (HAI) Surveillance
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

HAI surveillance for CAUTI, CLABSI, SSI and VAP is conducted according to international definitions with benchmarked rate tracking.

Recommendation:Sustain high-quality epidemiological surveillance.
6.1.10
CORE
SAFETY
Isolation Facilities and Airborne Infection Control
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Isolation suites inspected in ICU and ED demonstrated verified negative differential pressure (−3.2 Pa and −3.0 Pa) with certified HEPA filtration.

Recommendation:Maintain strict isolation engineering controls.
6.2.1
SAFETY
Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS) Programme
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

AMS programme operates effectively with restricted antibiotic pre-authorization and multidisciplinary clinical rounds. Antibiogram is published and utilized.

Recommendation:Continue robust antimicrobial stewardship.
6.2.5
SAFETY
Outbreak Preparedness and Management Plan
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Outbreak management plan and e-Notifikasi communicable disease reporting pathways are functional with rapid cluster investigation protocols.

Recommendation:Maintain high outbreak preparedness.
7.1.1
CORE
Patient Charter and Informed Consent
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Patient Charter is displayed in all four major languages. Informed consent forms sampled in surgical files were thoroughly completed and signed prior to procedures.

Recommendation:Maintain high patient rights and informed consent standards.
7.1.3Patient Privacy and Confidentiality
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Patient modesty is respected in all clinical examination areas with privacy curtains, gowns and dedicated chaperone presence documented during examinations.

Recommendation:Sustain patient privacy and dignity practices.
7.2.1Customer Feedback and Grievance Mechanism
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Grievance and complaint handling mechanism functions well with timely investigation, root cause review and written communications provided to complainants.

Recommendation:Continue transparent customer feedback management.
8.1.1
CORE
Medical Record Management and Security
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Medical Records file room is secure with controlled access, FM200 fire suppression and efficient barcode record tracking.

Recommendation:Maintain secure physical and electronic record management.
8.2.1
CORE
Medical Record Content and Clinical Entry Quality
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Sampled inpatient medical records demonstrated good clinical note quality, clear diagnostic entries and prompt operative note documentation.

Recommendation:Sustain clinical documentation quality standards.
8.3.1Electronic Medical Record (EMR) Access and Audit Trail
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Electronic medical records enforce strong role-based access control, unique user logins, session timeouts and comprehensive audit trails.

Recommendation:Maintain robust cybersecurity and EMR access controls.
16.1.1
CORE
SAFETY
CSSD Zoning and Unidirectional Workflow
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

CSSD layout demonstrates clear physical separation between dirty decontamination and clean assembly zones with pass-through double-door equipment.

Recommendation:Maintain excellent physical zoning and workflow separation.
16.2.1
CORE
SAFETY
Sterilisation Monitoring and Biological Indicators
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Sterilisation monitoring is rigorous with physical cycle printouts, Class 5 integrators and daily biological indicator incubation logs completely documented.

Recommendation:Continue rigorous sterilisation monitoring protocols.
16.3.1
SAFETY
Instrument Traceability and Tracking to Patient
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Instrument set barcode tracking links sterilisation batch loads directly to patient operative records, enabling rapid batch tracing.

Recommendation:Sustain comprehensive instrument traceability.
18.1.1
CORE
SAFETY
Pharmacy Licensing and Medication Storage
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Pharmacy premises are licensed and secure. Dangerous drugs safe is double-locked with daily balance tallies, and cold-chain fridges maintain continuous 2–8°C logs.

Recommendation:Maintain high standards of pharmaceutical storage security.
18.2.1
CORE
SAFETY
Prescription Screening and Clinical Dispensing
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Clinical pharmacist prescription screening is thorough with clear documentation of drug interaction interventions and patient counseling.

Recommendation:Continue excellent clinical dispensing and screening practices.
18.2.5
CORE
SAFETY
Medication Reconciliation on Inpatient Admission and Transfer
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Medication reconciliation process demonstrates sustained excellence post-closure of SIQ-2025-024. Ward audits confirm clinical pharmacist reconciliation within 24 hours in 93.5% of transfers.

Recommendation:Sustain the robust medication reconciliation workflows established following SIQ-2025-024 resolution.
19.1.1
CORE
SAFETY
Diagnostic Imaging Radiation Safety and Licences
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Diagnostic imaging radiation safety is well governed under current AELB licences with active RPO oversight, staff TLD badge monitoring and certified protective lead apparel.

Recommendation:Maintain strict ALARA radiation safety practices.
22.1.1Hospital Housekeeping Colour-Coding and Chemical Dilution
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Housekeeping operations follow strict 4-colour equipment coding and automated chemical dilution dispensers with documented supervisor cleanliness audits.

Recommendation:Continue rigorous housekeeping hygiene protocols.
01.1.1.11Executive Governance Protocol 1.1
Low Risk
Self: partial → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Governance, Leadership and Direction verifies full compliance with executive governance requirements and active supervisory oversight.

Basis for Divergence:

Self-assessment noted a historical documentation lag; surveyor verification of recent remediation records confirmed that executive governance operational controls are now fully met.

01.1.2.12Clinical Oversight Protocol 1.2
Low Risk
Self: partial → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Governance, Leadership and Direction substantiate consistent execution of clinical oversight workflows across clinical shifts.

Basis for Divergence:

The hospital self-rated Partially Met conservatively during internal freeze; surveyor sampling of recent quarterly logs verified that clinical oversight compliance is fully established in Governance, Leadership and Direction.

01.1.3.13Strategic Leadership Protocol 1.3
Low Risk
Self: partial → Surv: met

Inspection of Governance, Leadership and Direction surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for strategic leadership.

Basis for Divergence:

Self-assessment noted a historical documentation lag; surveyor verification of recent remediation records confirmed that strategic leadership operational controls are now fully met.

01.2.3.17Executive Governance Protocol 2.3
Low Risk
Self: partial → Surv: met

Inspection of Governance, Leadership and Direction surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for executive governance.

Basis for Divergence:

Self-assessment noted a historical documentation lag; surveyor verification of recent remediation records confirmed that executive governance operational controls are now fully met.

01.2.4.18Clinical Oversight Protocol 2.4
Low Risk
Self: partial → Surv: met

On-site audit of governance, leadership and direction operational records confirms that clinical oversight protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

Basis for Divergence:

The hospital self-rated Partially Met conservatively during internal freeze; surveyor sampling of recent quarterly logs verified that clinical oversight compliance is fully established in Governance, Leadership and Direction.

01.3.1.19Strategic Leadership Protocol 3.1
Low Risk
Self: partial → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Governance, Leadership and Direction verifies full compliance with strategic leadership requirements and active supervisory oversight.

Basis for Divergence:

Self-assessment noted a historical documentation lag; surveyor verification of recent remediation records confirmed that strategic leadership operational controls are now fully met.

01.3.2.20Statutory Compliance Protocol 3.2
Low Risk
Self: partial → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Governance, Leadership and Direction substantiate consistent execution of statutory compliance workflows across clinical shifts.

Basis for Divergence:

The hospital self-rated Partially Met conservatively during internal freeze; surveyor sampling of recent quarterly logs verified that statutory compliance compliance is fully established in Governance, Leadership and Direction.

01.3.3.21Workforce Welfare Protocol 3.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Governance, Leadership and Direction surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for workforce welfare.

01.4.1.23Executive Governance Protocol 4.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Governance, Leadership and Direction verifies full compliance with executive governance requirements and active supervisory oversight.

01.4.2.24Clinical Oversight Protocol 4.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Governance, Leadership and Direction substantiate consistent execution of clinical oversight workflows across clinical shifts.

02.1.1.11Environmental Safety Protocol 1.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Environmental and Safety Services verifies full compliance with environmental safety requirements and active supervisory oversight.

02.1.2.12Hazard Management Protocol 1.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Environmental and Safety Services substantiate consistent execution of hazard management workflows across clinical shifts.

02.1.3.13Emergency Preparedness Protocol 1.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Environmental and Safety Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for emergency preparedness.

02.1.4.14Disaster Resilience Protocol 1.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of environmental and safety services operational records confirms that disaster resilience protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

02.2.2.16Environmental Safety Protocol 2.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Environmental and Safety Services substantiate consistent execution of environmental safety workflows across clinical shifts.

02.2.3.17Hazard Management Protocol 2.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Environmental and Safety Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for hazard management.

02.2.4.18
CORE
Emergency Preparedness Protocol 2.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of environmental and safety services operational records confirms that emergency preparedness protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

02.3.1.19Disaster Resilience Protocol 3.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Environmental and Safety Services verifies full compliance with disaster resilience requirements and active supervisory oversight.

02.3.2.20Facility Protection Protocol 3.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Environmental and Safety Services substantiate consistent execution of facility protection workflows across clinical shifts.

02.3.3.21Environmental Safety Protocol 3.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Environmental and Safety Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for environmental safety.

02.3.4.22Hazard Management Protocol 3.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of environmental and safety services operational records confirms that hazard management protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

02.4.1.23Emergency Preparedness Protocol 4.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Environmental and Safety Services verifies full compliance with emergency preparedness requirements and active supervisory oversight.

02.4.2.24Disaster Resilience Protocol 4.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Environmental and Safety Services substantiate consistent execution of disaster resilience workflows across clinical shifts.

02.4.3.25Facility Protection Protocol 4.3
Low Risk
Self: na → Surv: na

Departmental scope verification confirms that facility protection is not applicable to the operational services provided by Environmental and Safety Services at this facility.

03.1.1.11Plant Operations Protocol 1.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Facility Management and Safety verifies full compliance with plant operations requirements and active supervisory oversight.

03.1.2.12Physical Infrastructure Protocol 1.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Facility Management and Safety substantiate consistent execution of physical infrastructure workflows across clinical shifts.

03.1.3.13Utility Redundancy Protocol 1.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Facility Management and Safety surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for utility redundancy.

03.2.1.15Space Optimization Protocol 2.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Facility Management and Safety verifies full compliance with space optimization requirements and active supervisory oversight.

03.2.4.18Utility Redundancy Protocol 2.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of facility management and safety operational records confirms that utility redundancy protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

03.3.1.19Structural Maintenance Protocol 3.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Facility Management and Safety verifies full compliance with structural maintenance requirements and active supervisory oversight.

03.3.2.20Space Optimization Protocol 3.2
Low Risk
Self: partial → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Facility Management and Safety substantiate consistent execution of space optimization workflows across clinical shifts.

Basis for Divergence:

The hospital self-rated Partially Met conservatively during internal freeze; surveyor sampling of recent quarterly logs verified that space optimization compliance is fully established in Facility Management and Safety.

03.3.4.22Physical Infrastructure Protocol 3.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of facility management and safety operational records confirms that physical infrastructure protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

03.4.2.24Structural Maintenance Protocol 4.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Facility Management and Safety substantiate consistent execution of structural maintenance workflows across clinical shifts.

03.4.3.25Space Optimization Protocol 4.3
Low Risk
Self: na → Surv: na

Departmental scope verification confirms that space optimization is not applicable to the operational services provided by Facility Management and Safety at this facility.

04.1.1.11
CORE
Biomedical Maintenance Protocol 1.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Biomedical Engineering Services verifies full compliance with biomedical maintenance requirements and active supervisory oversight.

04.1.2.12Calibration Assurance Protocol 1.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Biomedical Engineering Services substantiate consistent execution of calibration assurance workflows across clinical shifts.

04.1.3.13Device Lifecycle Protocol 1.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Biomedical Engineering Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for device lifecycle.

04.1.4.14Safety Alert Execution Protocol 1.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of biomedical engineering services operational records confirms that safety alert execution protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

04.2.1.15Operator Competency Protocol 2.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Biomedical Engineering Services verifies full compliance with operator competency requirements and active supervisory oversight.

04.2.2.16Biomedical Maintenance Protocol 2.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Biomedical Engineering Services substantiate consistent execution of biomedical maintenance workflows across clinical shifts.

04.2.3.17Calibration Assurance Protocol 2.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Biomedical Engineering Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for calibration assurance.

04.2.4.18Device Lifecycle Protocol 2.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of biomedical engineering services operational records confirms that device lifecycle protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

04.3.1.19Safety Alert Execution Protocol 3.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Biomedical Engineering Services verifies full compliance with safety alert execution requirements and active supervisory oversight.

04.3.2.20Operator Competency Protocol 3.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Biomedical Engineering Services substantiate consistent execution of operator competency workflows across clinical shifts.

04.3.4.22Calibration Assurance Protocol 3.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of biomedical engineering services operational records confirms that calibration assurance protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

04.4.3.25Operator Competency Protocol 4.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: na

Departmental scope verification confirms that operator competency is not applicable to the operational services provided by Biomedical Engineering Services at this facility.

Basis for Divergence:

Surveyor on-site verification revealed discrepancy in operator competency compliance records compared against hospital self-assessment claim.

05.1.1.11Nursing Care Delivery Protocol 1.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Nursing Services verifies full compliance with nursing care delivery requirements and active supervisory oversight.

05.1.3.13Patient Monitoring Protocol 1.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Nursing Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for patient monitoring.

05.1.4.14Medication Safety Protocol 1.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of nursing services operational records confirms that medication safety protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

05.2.1.15Shift Handover Protocol 2.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Nursing Services verifies full compliance with shift handover requirements and active supervisory oversight.

05.2.2.16Nursing Care Delivery Protocol 2.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Nursing Services substantiate consistent execution of nursing care delivery workflows across clinical shifts.

05.2.3.17Clinical Documentation Protocol 2.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Nursing Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for clinical documentation.

05.2.4.18Patient Monitoring Protocol 2.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of nursing services operational records confirms that patient monitoring protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

05.3.1.19
CORE
Medication Safety Protocol 3.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Nursing Services verifies full compliance with medication safety requirements and active supervisory oversight.

05.3.2.20Shift Handover Protocol 3.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Nursing Services substantiate consistent execution of shift handover workflows across clinical shifts.

05.3.3.21Nursing Care Delivery Protocol 3.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Nursing Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for nursing care delivery.

05.3.4.22Clinical Documentation Protocol 3.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of nursing services operational records confirms that clinical documentation protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

05.4.1.23Patient Monitoring Protocol 4.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Nursing Services verifies full compliance with patient monitoring requirements and active supervisory oversight.

05.4.2.24Medication Safety Protocol 4.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Nursing Services substantiate consistent execution of medication safety workflows across clinical shifts.

06.1.1.11Aseptic Practice Protocol 1.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Prevention and Control of Infection verifies full compliance with aseptic practice requirements and active supervisory oversight.

06.1.2.12Surveillance Protocols Protocol 1.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Prevention and Control of Infection substantiate consistent execution of surveillance protocols workflows across clinical shifts.

06.1.3.13Outbreak Response Protocol 1.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Prevention and Control of Infection surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for outbreak response.

06.1.4.14Sterilisation Standards Protocol 1.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of prevention and control of infection operational records confirms that sterilisation standards protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

06.2.2.16Aseptic Practice Protocol 2.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Prevention and Control of Infection substantiate consistent execution of aseptic practice workflows across clinical shifts.

06.2.3.17Surveillance Protocols Protocol 2.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Prevention and Control of Infection surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for surveillance protocols.

06.2.4.18Outbreak Response Protocol 2.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of prevention and control of infection operational records confirms that outbreak response protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

06.3.1.19Sterilisation Standards Protocol 3.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Prevention and Control of Infection verifies full compliance with sterilisation standards requirements and active supervisory oversight.

06.3.2.20Environmental Cleanliness Protocol 3.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Prevention and Control of Infection substantiate consistent execution of environmental cleanliness workflows across clinical shifts.

06.3.3.21Aseptic Practice Protocol 3.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Prevention and Control of Infection surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for aseptic practice.

06.3.4.22Surveillance Protocols Protocol 3.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of prevention and control of infection operational records confirms that surveillance protocols protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

06.4.1.23Outbreak Response Protocol 4.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Prevention and Control of Infection verifies full compliance with outbreak response requirements and active supervisory oversight.

06.4.2.24Sterilisation Standards Protocol 4.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Prevention and Control of Infection substantiate consistent execution of sterilisation standards workflows across clinical shifts.

07.1.1.11Informed Consent Protocol 1.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Patient and Family Rights verifies full compliance with informed consent requirements and active supervisory oversight.

07.1.3.13Feedback Resolution Protocol 1.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Patient and Family Rights surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for feedback resolution.

07.1.4.14Vulnerable Patient Protection Protocol 1.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of patient and family rights operational records confirms that vulnerable patient protection protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

07.2.1.15Palliative Care Support Protocol 2.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Patient and Family Rights verifies full compliance with palliative care support requirements and active supervisory oversight.

07.2.2.16Informed Consent Protocol 2.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Patient and Family Rights substantiate consistent execution of informed consent workflows across clinical shifts.

07.2.3.17Patient Dignity Protocol 2.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Patient and Family Rights surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for patient dignity.

07.3.2.20Palliative Care Support Protocol 3.2
Low Risk
Self: partial → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Patient and Family Rights substantiate consistent execution of palliative care support workflows across clinical shifts.

Basis for Divergence:

The hospital self-rated Partially Met conservatively during internal freeze; surveyor sampling of recent quarterly logs verified that palliative care support compliance is fully established in Patient and Family Rights.

07.3.3.21Informed Consent Protocol 3.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Patient and Family Rights surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for informed consent.

07.3.4.22Patient Dignity Protocol 3.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of patient and family rights operational records confirms that patient dignity protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

07.4.2.24Vulnerable Patient Protection Protocol 4.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Patient and Family Rights substantiate consistent execution of vulnerable patient protection workflows across clinical shifts.

07.4.3.25Palliative Care Support Protocol 4.3
Low Risk
Self: na → Surv: na

Departmental scope verification confirms that palliative care support is not applicable to the operational services provided by Patient and Family Rights at this facility.

08.1.1.11Medical Records Storage Protocol 1.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Health Information and Medical Records verifies full compliance with medical records storage requirements and active supervisory oversight.

08.1.2.12Clinical Documentation Protocol 1.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Health Information and Medical Records substantiate consistent execution of clinical documentation workflows across clinical shifts.

08.1.3.13EMR Access Controls Protocol 1.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Health Information and Medical Records surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for emr access controls.

08.1.4.14Information Release Protocol 1.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of health information and medical records operational records confirms that information release protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

08.2.1.15Audit Completeness Protocol 2.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Health Information and Medical Records verifies full compliance with audit completeness requirements and active supervisory oversight.

08.2.3.17Clinical Documentation Protocol 2.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Health Information and Medical Records surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for clinical documentation.

08.2.4.18EMR Access Controls Protocol 2.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of health information and medical records operational records confirms that emr access controls protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

08.3.1.19Information Release Protocol 3.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Health Information and Medical Records verifies full compliance with information release requirements and active supervisory oversight.

08.3.2.20
CORE
Audit Completeness Protocol 3.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Health Information and Medical Records substantiate consistent execution of audit completeness workflows across clinical shifts.

08.3.3.21Medical Records Storage Protocol 3.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Health Information and Medical Records surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for medical records storage.

08.3.4.22Clinical Documentation Protocol 3.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of health information and medical records operational records confirms that clinical documentation protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

08.4.2.24Information Release Protocol 4.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Health Information and Medical Records substantiate consistent execution of information release workflows across clinical shifts.

08.4.3.25Audit Completeness Protocol 4.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: na

Departmental scope verification confirms that audit completeness is not applicable to the operational services provided by Health Information and Medical Records at this facility.

Basis for Divergence:

Surveyor on-site verification revealed discrepancy in audit completeness compliance records compared against hospital self-assessment claim.

09A.1.1.11Internal Medicine Care Protocol 1.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in General Medical Services verifies full compliance with internal medicine care requirements and active supervisory oversight.

Standard 09AOpen Split Ledger
09A.1.2.12Specialist Consultation Protocol 1.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in General Medical Services substantiate consistent execution of specialist consultation workflows across clinical shifts.

Standard 09AOpen Split Ledger
09A.1.3.13Ward Rounds Protocol 1.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of General Medical Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for ward rounds.

Standard 09AOpen Split Ledger
09A.1.4.14Diagnostic Pathways Protocol 1.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of general medical services operational records confirms that diagnostic pathways protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

Standard 09AOpen Split Ledger
09A.2.1.15Discharge Planning Protocol 2.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in General Medical Services verifies full compliance with discharge planning requirements and active supervisory oversight.

Standard 09AOpen Split Ledger
09A.2.2.16Internal Medicine Care Protocol 2.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in General Medical Services substantiate consistent execution of internal medicine care workflows across clinical shifts.

Standard 09AOpen Split Ledger
09A.2.3.17Specialist Consultation Protocol 2.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of General Medical Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for specialist consultation.

Standard 09AOpen Split Ledger
09A.2.4.18Ward Rounds Protocol 2.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of general medical services operational records confirms that ward rounds protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

Standard 09AOpen Split Ledger
09A.3.3.21Internal Medicine Care Protocol 3.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of General Medical Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for internal medicine care.

Standard 09AOpen Split Ledger
09A.3.4.22Specialist Consultation Protocol 3.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of general medical services operational records confirms that specialist consultation protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

Standard 09AOpen Split Ledger
09A.4.1.23Ward Rounds Protocol 4.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in General Medical Services verifies full compliance with ward rounds requirements and active supervisory oversight.

Standard 09AOpen Split Ledger
09B.1.1.11Surgical Care Delivery Protocol 1.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in General Surgical Services verifies full compliance with surgical care delivery requirements and active supervisory oversight.

Standard 09BOpen Split Ledger
09B.1.2.12Pre-operative Assessment Protocol 1.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in General Surgical Services substantiate consistent execution of pre-operative assessment workflows across clinical shifts.

Standard 09BOpen Split Ledger
09B.1.3.13
CORE
Post-operative Surveillance Protocol 1.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of General Surgical Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for post-operative surveillance.

Standard 09BOpen Split Ledger
09B.1.4.14Surgical Safety Checklist Protocol 1.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of general surgical services operational records confirms that surgical safety checklist protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

Standard 09BOpen Split Ledger
09B.2.1.15Tissue Audit Protocol 2.1
Low Risk
Self: partial → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in General Surgical Services verifies full compliance with tissue audit requirements and active supervisory oversight.

Basis for Divergence:

Self-assessment noted a historical documentation lag; surveyor verification of recent remediation records confirmed that tissue audit operational controls are now fully met.

Standard 09BOpen Split Ledger
09B.2.2.16Surgical Care Delivery Protocol 2.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in General Surgical Services substantiate consistent execution of surgical care delivery workflows across clinical shifts.

Standard 09BOpen Split Ledger
09B.2.3.17Pre-operative Assessment Protocol 2.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of General Surgical Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for pre-operative assessment.

Standard 09BOpen Split Ledger
09B.2.4.18Post-operative Surveillance Protocol 2.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of general surgical services operational records confirms that post-operative surveillance protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

Standard 09BOpen Split Ledger
09B.3.1.19Surgical Safety Checklist Protocol 3.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in General Surgical Services verifies full compliance with surgical safety checklist requirements and active supervisory oversight.

Standard 09BOpen Split Ledger
09B.3.2.20Tissue Audit Protocol 3.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in General Surgical Services substantiate consistent execution of tissue audit workflows across clinical shifts.

Standard 09BOpen Split Ledger
09B.3.3.21Surgical Care Delivery Protocol 3.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of General Surgical Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for surgical care delivery.

Standard 09BOpen Split Ledger
09B.3.4.22Pre-operative Assessment Protocol 3.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of general surgical services operational records confirms that pre-operative assessment protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

Standard 09BOpen Split Ledger
09B.4.1.23Post-operative Surveillance Protocol 4.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in General Surgical Services verifies full compliance with post-operative surveillance requirements and active supervisory oversight.

Standard 09BOpen Split Ledger
09C.1.1.11Obstetric Management Protocol 1.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Obstetric and Gynaecological Services verifies full compliance with obstetric management requirements and active supervisory oversight.

Standard 09COpen Split Ledger
09C.1.3.13Intrapartum Care Protocol 1.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Obstetric and Gynaecological Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for intrapartum care.

Standard 09COpen Split Ledger
09C.2.1.15Gynaecological Procedures Protocol 2.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Obstetric and Gynaecological Services verifies full compliance with gynaecological procedures requirements and active supervisory oversight.

Standard 09COpen Split Ledger
09C.2.2.16Obstetric Management Protocol 2.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Obstetric and Gynaecological Services substantiate consistent execution of obstetric management workflows across clinical shifts.

Standard 09COpen Split Ledger
09C.2.3.17Antenatal Assessment Protocol 2.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Obstetric and Gynaecological Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for antenatal assessment.

Standard 09COpen Split Ledger
09C.3.1.19Postnatal Monitoring Protocol 3.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Obstetric and Gynaecological Services verifies full compliance with postnatal monitoring requirements and active supervisory oversight.

Standard 09COpen Split Ledger
09C.3.2.20Gynaecological Procedures Protocol 3.2
Low Risk
Self: partial → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Obstetric and Gynaecological Services substantiate consistent execution of gynaecological procedures workflows across clinical shifts.

Basis for Divergence:

The hospital self-rated Partially Met conservatively during internal freeze; surveyor sampling of recent quarterly logs verified that gynaecological procedures compliance is fully established in Obstetric and Gynaecological Services.

Standard 09COpen Split Ledger
09C.3.3.21
CORE
Obstetric Management Protocol 3.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Obstetric and Gynaecological Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for obstetric management.

Standard 09COpen Split Ledger
09C.3.4.22Antenatal Assessment Protocol 3.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of obstetric and gynaecological services operational records confirms that antenatal assessment protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

Standard 09COpen Split Ledger
09C.4.1.23Intrapartum Care Protocol 4.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Obstetric and Gynaecological Services verifies full compliance with intrapartum care requirements and active supervisory oversight.

Standard 09COpen Split Ledger
09C.4.3.25Gynaecological Procedures Protocol 4.3
Low Risk
Self: na → Surv: na

Departmental scope verification confirms that gynaecological procedures is not applicable to the operational services provided by Obstetric and Gynaecological Services at this facility.

Standard 09COpen Split Ledger
09D.1.2.12Immunization Protocols Protocol 1.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Paediatric Services substantiate consistent execution of immunization protocols workflows across clinical shifts.

Standard 09DOpen Split Ledger
09D.1.4.14Child Safety Safeguards Protocol 1.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of paediatric services operational records confirms that child safety safeguards protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

Standard 09DOpen Split Ledger
09D.2.1.15Growth Monitoring Protocol 2.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Paediatric Services verifies full compliance with growth monitoring requirements and active supervisory oversight.

Standard 09DOpen Split Ledger
09D.2.2.16Paediatric Inpatient Care Protocol 2.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Paediatric Services substantiate consistent execution of paediatric inpatient care workflows across clinical shifts.

Standard 09DOpen Split Ledger
09D.2.3.17Immunization Protocols Protocol 2.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Paediatric Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for immunization protocols.

Standard 09DOpen Split Ledger
09D.2.4.18Neonatal Resuscitation Protocol 2.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of paediatric services operational records confirms that neonatal resuscitation protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

Standard 09DOpen Split Ledger
09D.3.2.20Growth Monitoring Protocol 3.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Paediatric Services substantiate consistent execution of growth monitoring workflows across clinical shifts.

Standard 09DOpen Split Ledger
09D.3.4.22Immunization Protocols Protocol 3.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of paediatric services operational records confirms that immunization protocols protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

Standard 09DOpen Split Ledger
09D.4.1.23Neonatal Resuscitation Protocol 4.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Paediatric Services verifies full compliance with neonatal resuscitation requirements and active supervisory oversight.

Standard 09DOpen Split Ledger
09D.4.2.24Child Safety Safeguards Protocol 4.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Paediatric Services substantiate consistent execution of child safety safeguards workflows across clinical shifts.

Standard 09DOpen Split Ledger
09E.1.1.11Orthopaedic Procedures Protocol 1.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Orthopaedic Services verifies full compliance with orthopaedic procedures requirements and active supervisory oversight.

Standard 09EOpen Split Ledger
09E.2.1.15Surgical Infection Control Protocol 2.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Orthopaedic Services verifies full compliance with surgical infection control requirements and active supervisory oversight.

Standard 09EOpen Split Ledger
09E.2.4.18Implant Traceability Protocol 2.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of orthopaedic services operational records confirms that implant traceability protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

Standard 09EOpen Split Ledger
09E.3.1.19Rehabilitation Integration Protocol 3.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Orthopaedic Services verifies full compliance with rehabilitation integration requirements and active supervisory oversight.

Standard 09EOpen Split Ledger
09E.3.3.21Orthopaedic Procedures Protocol 3.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Orthopaedic Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for orthopaedic procedures.

Standard 09EOpen Split Ledger
09E.4.1.23Implant Traceability Protocol 4.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Orthopaedic Services verifies full compliance with implant traceability requirements and active supervisory oversight.

Standard 09EOpen Split Ledger
09E.4.2.24Rehabilitation Integration Protocol 4.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Orthopaedic Services substantiate consistent execution of rehabilitation integration workflows across clinical shifts.

Standard 09EOpen Split Ledger
09F.1.2.12Intra-operative Monitoring Protocol 1.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Anaesthetic Services substantiate consistent execution of intra-operative monitoring workflows across clinical shifts.

Standard 09FOpen Split Ledger
09F.1.3.13PACU Recovery Care Protocol 1.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Anaesthetic Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for pacu recovery care.

Standard 09FOpen Split Ledger
09F.1.4.14Pain Management Protocols Protocol 1.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of anaesthetic services operational records confirms that pain management protocols protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

Standard 09FOpen Split Ledger
09F.2.1.15Anaesthetic Equipment Safety Protocol 2.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Anaesthetic Services verifies full compliance with anaesthetic equipment safety requirements and active supervisory oversight.

Standard 09FOpen Split Ledger
09F.2.2.16Anaesthetic Pre-assessment Protocol 2.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Anaesthetic Services substantiate consistent execution of anaesthetic pre-assessment workflows across clinical shifts.

Standard 09FOpen Split Ledger
09F.2.4.18PACU Recovery Care Protocol 2.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of anaesthetic services operational records confirms that pacu recovery care protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

Standard 09FOpen Split Ledger
09F.3.1.19Pain Management Protocols Protocol 3.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Anaesthetic Services verifies full compliance with pain management protocols requirements and active supervisory oversight.

Standard 09FOpen Split Ledger
09F.3.2.20Anaesthetic Equipment Safety Protocol 3.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Anaesthetic Services substantiate consistent execution of anaesthetic equipment safety workflows across clinical shifts.

Standard 09FOpen Split Ledger
09F.3.3.21Anaesthetic Pre-assessment Protocol 3.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Anaesthetic Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for anaesthetic pre-assessment.

Standard 09FOpen Split Ledger
09F.3.4.22
CORE
Intra-operative Monitoring Protocol 3.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of anaesthetic services operational records confirms that intra-operative monitoring protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

Standard 09FOpen Split Ledger
09F.4.2.24Pain Management Protocols Protocol 4.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Anaesthetic Services substantiate consistent execution of pain management protocols workflows across clinical shifts.

Standard 09FOpen Split Ledger
09F.4.3.25Anaesthetic Equipment Safety Protocol 4.3
Low Risk
Self: na → Surv: na

Departmental scope verification confirms that anaesthetic equipment safety is not applicable to the operational services provided by Anaesthetic Services at this facility.

Standard 09FOpen Split Ledger
10.1.2.12Surgical Scheduling Protocol 1.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Operating Suite Services substantiate consistent execution of surgical scheduling workflows across clinical shifts.

10.1.3.13Traffic Flow Controls Protocol 1.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Operating Suite Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for traffic flow controls.

10.1.4.14Sterility Assurance Protocol 1.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of operating suite services operational records confirms that sterility assurance protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

10.2.1.15Count Verification Protocol 2.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Operating Suite Services verifies full compliance with count verification requirements and active supervisory oversight.

10.2.4.18Traffic Flow Controls Protocol 2.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of operating suite services operational records confirms that traffic flow controls protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

10.3.1.19Sterility Assurance Protocol 3.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Operating Suite Services verifies full compliance with sterility assurance requirements and active supervisory oversight.

10.3.2.20Count Verification Protocol 3.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Operating Suite Services substantiate consistent execution of count verification workflows across clinical shifts.

10.3.3.21Operating Theatre Zoning Protocol 3.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Operating Suite Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for operating theatre zoning.

10.3.4.22Surgical Scheduling Protocol 3.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of operating suite services operational records confirms that surgical scheduling protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

10.4.1.23Traffic Flow Controls Protocol 4.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Operating Suite Services verifies full compliance with traffic flow controls requirements and active supervisory oversight.

10.4.3.25Count Verification Protocol 4.3
Low Risk
Self: na → Surv: na

Departmental scope verification confirms that count verification is not applicable to the operational services provided by Operating Suite Services at this facility.

11.1.1.11Day Surgery Workflow Protocol 1.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Ambulatory Care Services verifies full compliance with day surgery workflow requirements and active supervisory oversight.

11.1.2.12Outpatient Consultation Protocol 1.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Ambulatory Care Services substantiate consistent execution of outpatient consultation workflows across clinical shifts.

11.1.3.13Discharge Readiness Protocol 1.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Ambulatory Care Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for discharge readiness.

11.1.4.14Procedure Room Safety Protocol 1.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of ambulatory care services operational records confirms that procedure room safety protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

11.2.1.15
CORE
Patient Education Protocol 2.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Ambulatory Care Services verifies full compliance with patient education requirements and active supervisory oversight.

11.2.2.16Day Surgery Workflow Protocol 2.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Ambulatory Care Services substantiate consistent execution of day surgery workflow workflows across clinical shifts.

11.2.4.18Discharge Readiness Protocol 2.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of ambulatory care services operational records confirms that discharge readiness protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

11.3.1.19Procedure Room Safety Protocol 3.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Ambulatory Care Services verifies full compliance with procedure room safety requirements and active supervisory oversight.

11.3.3.21Day Surgery Workflow Protocol 3.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Ambulatory Care Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for day surgery workflow.

11.3.4.22Outpatient Consultation Protocol 3.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of ambulatory care services operational records confirms that outpatient consultation protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

11.4.1.23Discharge Readiness Protocol 4.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Ambulatory Care Services verifies full compliance with discharge readiness requirements and active supervisory oversight.

11.4.2.24Procedure Room Safety Protocol 4.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Ambulatory Care Services substantiate consistent execution of procedure room safety workflows across clinical shifts.

12A.1.1.11Critical Care Monitoring Protocol 1.1
Low Risk
Self: na → Surv: na

Departmental scope verification confirms that critical care monitoring is not applicable to the operational services provided by Critical Care Services - General / ICU at this facility.

Standard 12AOpen Split Ledger
12A.1.3.13Central Line Safety Protocol 1.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Critical Care Services - General / ICU surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for central line safety.

Standard 12AOpen Split Ledger
12A.1.4.14Intensive Resuscitation Protocol 1.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of critical care services - general / icu operational records confirms that intensive resuscitation protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

Standard 12AOpen Split Ledger
12A.2.1.15Critical Handover Protocol 2.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Critical Care Services - General / ICU verifies full compliance with critical handover requirements and active supervisory oversight.

Standard 12AOpen Split Ledger
12A.2.2.16Critical Care Monitoring Protocol 2.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Critical Care Services - General / ICU substantiate consistent execution of critical care monitoring workflows across clinical shifts.

Standard 12AOpen Split Ledger
12A.2.3.17Ventilator Care Bundles Protocol 2.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Critical Care Services - General / ICU surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for ventilator care bundles.

Standard 12AOpen Split Ledger
12A.2.4.18Central Line Safety Protocol 2.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of critical care services - general / icu operational records confirms that central line safety protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

Standard 12AOpen Split Ledger
12A.3.1.19Intensive Resuscitation Protocol 3.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Critical Care Services - General / ICU verifies full compliance with intensive resuscitation requirements and active supervisory oversight.

Standard 12AOpen Split Ledger
12A.3.2.20Critical Handover Protocol 3.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Critical Care Services - General / ICU substantiate consistent execution of critical handover workflows across clinical shifts.

Standard 12AOpen Split Ledger
12A.3.3.21Critical Care Monitoring Protocol 3.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Critical Care Services - General / ICU surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for critical care monitoring.

Standard 12AOpen Split Ledger
12A.3.4.22Ventilator Care Bundles Protocol 3.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of critical care services - general / icu operational records confirms that ventilator care bundles protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

Standard 12AOpen Split Ledger
13.1.1.11Labour Ward Triage Protocol 1.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Labour Delivery Services verifies full compliance with labour ward triage requirements and active supervisory oversight.

13.1.2.12Fetal Heart Monitoring Protocol 1.2
Low Risk
Self: na → Surv: na

Departmental scope verification confirms that fetal heart monitoring is not applicable to the operational services provided by Labour Delivery Services at this facility.

13.1.3.13Obstetric Emergency Response Protocol 1.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Labour Delivery Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for obstetric emergency response.

13.2.2.16Labour Ward Triage Protocol 2.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Labour Delivery Services substantiate consistent execution of labour ward triage workflows across clinical shifts.

13.2.3.17Fetal Heart Monitoring Protocol 2.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Labour Delivery Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for fetal heart monitoring.

13.3.1.19Newborn Delivery Protocol Protocol 3.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Labour Delivery Services verifies full compliance with newborn delivery protocol requirements and active supervisory oversight.

13.3.3.21Labour Ward Triage Protocol 3.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Labour Delivery Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for labour ward triage.

13.3.4.22Fetal Heart Monitoring Protocol 3.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of labour delivery services operational records confirms that fetal heart monitoring protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

13.4.2.24Newborn Delivery Protocol Protocol 4.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Labour Delivery Services substantiate consistent execution of newborn delivery protocol workflows across clinical shifts.

14.1.1.11Emergency Triage System Protocol 1.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Emergency Medical and Trauma Services verifies full compliance with emergency triage system requirements and active supervisory oversight.

14.2.1.15Emergency Observation Protocol 2.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Emergency Medical and Trauma Services verifies full compliance with emergency observation requirements and active supervisory oversight.

14.2.3.17Resuscitation Protocols Protocol 2.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Emergency Medical and Trauma Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for resuscitation protocols.

14.2.4.18Trauma Team Activation Protocol 2.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of emergency medical and trauma services operational records confirms that trauma team activation protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

14.3.1.19
CORE
Ambulance Reception Protocol 3.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Emergency Medical and Trauma Services verifies full compliance with ambulance reception requirements and active supervisory oversight.

14.3.2.20Emergency Observation Protocol 3.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Emergency Medical and Trauma Services substantiate consistent execution of emergency observation workflows across clinical shifts.

14.3.4.22Resuscitation Protocols Protocol 3.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of emergency medical and trauma services operational records confirms that resuscitation protocols protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

14.4.1.23Trauma Team Activation Protocol 4.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Emergency Medical and Trauma Services verifies full compliance with trauma team activation requirements and active supervisory oversight.

14.4.2.24Ambulance Reception Protocol 4.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Emergency Medical and Trauma Services substantiate consistent execution of ambulance reception workflows across clinical shifts.

15.1.1.11Therapeutic Dietetics Protocol 1.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Dietary and Food Services verifies full compliance with therapeutic dietetics requirements and active supervisory oversight.

15.1.2.12Food Safety Hygiene Protocol 1.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Dietary and Food Services substantiate consistent execution of food safety hygiene workflows across clinical shifts.

15.1.3.13Meal Temperature Control Protocol 1.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Dietary and Food Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for meal temperature control.

15.1.4.14Enteral Nutrition Protocol 1.4
Low Risk
Self: na → Surv: na

Departmental scope verification confirms that enteral nutrition is not applicable to the operational services provided by Dietary and Food Services at this facility.

15.2.1.15Hazard Analysis Critical Control Protocol 2.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Dietary and Food Services verifies full compliance with hazard analysis critical control requirements and active supervisory oversight.

15.2.2.16Therapeutic Dietetics Protocol 2.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Dietary and Food Services substantiate consistent execution of therapeutic dietetics workflows across clinical shifts.

15.2.3.17Food Safety Hygiene Protocol 2.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Dietary and Food Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for food safety hygiene.

15.2.4.18Meal Temperature Control Protocol 2.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of dietary and food services operational records confirms that meal temperature control protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

15.3.1.19Enteral Nutrition Protocol 3.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Dietary and Food Services verifies full compliance with enteral nutrition requirements and active supervisory oversight.

15.3.2.20Hazard Analysis Critical Control Protocol 3.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Dietary and Food Services substantiate consistent execution of hazard analysis critical control workflows across clinical shifts.

15.3.3.21Therapeutic Dietetics Protocol 3.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Dietary and Food Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for therapeutic dietetics.

15.3.4.22Food Safety Hygiene Protocol 3.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of dietary and food services operational records confirms that food safety hygiene protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

15.4.1.23Meal Temperature Control Protocol 4.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Dietary and Food Services verifies full compliance with meal temperature control requirements and active supervisory oversight.

15.4.2.24Enteral Nutrition Protocol 4.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Dietary and Food Services substantiate consistent execution of enteral nutrition workflows across clinical shifts.

16.1.2.12Packaging Integrity Protocol 1.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Central Sterile Supply Services (CSSD) substantiate consistent execution of packaging integrity workflows across clinical shifts.

16.1.3.13Sterilisation Batch Release Protocol 1.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Central Sterile Supply Services (CSSD) surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for sterilisation batch release.

16.1.4.14
CORE
Instrument Tracking Protocol 1.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of central sterile supply services (cssd) operational records confirms that instrument tracking protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

16.2.1.15Clean Storage Protocols Protocol 2.1
Low Risk
Self: na → Surv: na

Departmental scope verification confirms that clean storage protocols is not applicable to the operational services provided by Central Sterile Supply Services (CSSD) at this facility.

16.2.2.16Decontamination Processing Protocol 2.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Central Sterile Supply Services (CSSD) substantiate consistent execution of decontamination processing workflows across clinical shifts.

16.2.3.17Packaging Integrity Protocol 2.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Central Sterile Supply Services (CSSD) surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for packaging integrity.

16.3.2.20Clean Storage Protocols Protocol 3.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Central Sterile Supply Services (CSSD) substantiate consistent execution of clean storage protocols workflows across clinical shifts.

16.3.3.21Decontamination Processing Protocol 3.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Central Sterile Supply Services (CSSD) surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for decontamination processing.

16.3.4.22Packaging Integrity Protocol 3.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of central sterile supply services (cssd) operational records confirms that packaging integrity protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

16.4.1.23Sterilisation Batch Release Protocol 4.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Central Sterile Supply Services (CSSD) verifies full compliance with sterilisation batch release requirements and active supervisory oversight.

16.4.2.24Instrument Tracking Protocol 4.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Central Sterile Supply Services (CSSD) substantiate consistent execution of instrument tracking workflows across clinical shifts.

17A.1.1.11Physiotherapy Assessment Protocol 1.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Physiotherapy Services verifies full compliance with physiotherapy assessment requirements and active supervisory oversight.

Standard 17AOpen Split Ledger
17A.1.2.12Mobility Rehabilitation Protocol 1.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Physiotherapy Services substantiate consistent execution of mobility rehabilitation workflows across clinical shifts.

Standard 17AOpen Split Ledger
17A.1.3.13Therapeutic Modalities Protocol 1.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Physiotherapy Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for therapeutic modalities.

Standard 17AOpen Split Ledger
17A.2.1.15Patient Progress Tracking Protocol 2.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Physiotherapy Services verifies full compliance with patient progress tracking requirements and active supervisory oversight.

Standard 17AOpen Split Ledger
17A.2.3.17Mobility Rehabilitation Protocol 2.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Physiotherapy Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for mobility rehabilitation.

Standard 17AOpen Split Ledger
17A.2.4.18Therapeutic Modalities Protocol 2.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of physiotherapy services operational records confirms that therapeutic modalities protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

Standard 17AOpen Split Ledger
17A.3.1.19Chest Physiotherapy Protocol 3.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Physiotherapy Services verifies full compliance with chest physiotherapy requirements and active supervisory oversight.

Standard 17AOpen Split Ledger
17A.3.4.22Mobility Rehabilitation Protocol 3.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of physiotherapy services operational records confirms that mobility rehabilitation protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

Standard 17AOpen Split Ledger
17A.4.1.23
CORE
Therapeutic Modalities Protocol 4.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Physiotherapy Services verifies full compliance with therapeutic modalities requirements and active supervisory oversight.

Standard 17AOpen Split Ledger
17A.4.2.24Chest Physiotherapy Protocol 4.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Physiotherapy Services substantiate consistent execution of chest physiotherapy workflows across clinical shifts.

Standard 17AOpen Split Ledger
17B.1.1.11Occupational Therapy Protocol 1.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Occupational Therapy Services verifies full compliance with occupational therapy requirements and active supervisory oversight.

Standard 17BOpen Split Ledger
17B.1.2.12Activities of Daily Living Protocol 1.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Occupational Therapy Services substantiate consistent execution of activities of daily living workflows across clinical shifts.

Standard 17BOpen Split Ledger
17B.1.3.13Cognitive Assessment Protocol 1.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Occupational Therapy Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for cognitive assessment.

Standard 17BOpen Split Ledger
17B.1.4.14Splinting Services Protocol 1.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of occupational therapy services operational records confirms that splinting services protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

Standard 17BOpen Split Ledger
17B.2.1.15Ergonomic Evaluation Protocol 2.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Occupational Therapy Services verifies full compliance with ergonomic evaluation requirements and active supervisory oversight.

Standard 17BOpen Split Ledger
17B.2.2.16Occupational Therapy Protocol 2.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Occupational Therapy Services substantiate consistent execution of occupational therapy workflows across clinical shifts.

Standard 17BOpen Split Ledger
17B.2.4.18Cognitive Assessment Protocol 2.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of occupational therapy services operational records confirms that cognitive assessment protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

Standard 17BOpen Split Ledger
17B.3.3.21Occupational Therapy Protocol 3.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Occupational Therapy Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for occupational therapy.

Standard 17BOpen Split Ledger
17B.3.4.22Activities of Daily Living Protocol 3.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of occupational therapy services operational records confirms that activities of daily living protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

Standard 17BOpen Split Ledger
17B.4.1.23Cognitive Assessment Protocol 4.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Occupational Therapy Services verifies full compliance with cognitive assessment requirements and active supervisory oversight.

Standard 17BOpen Split Ledger
17B.4.2.24Splinting Services Protocol 4.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Occupational Therapy Services substantiate consistent execution of splinting services workflows across clinical shifts.

Standard 17BOpen Split Ledger
18.1.1.11Prescription Verification Protocol 1.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Pharmacy Services verifies full compliance with prescription verification requirements and active supervisory oversight.

18.1.3.13Cold Chain Assurance Protocol 1.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Pharmacy Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for cold chain assurance.

18.2.2.16Prescription Verification Protocol 2.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Pharmacy Services substantiate consistent execution of prescription verification workflows across clinical shifts.

18.2.3.17Formulary Management Protocol 2.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Pharmacy Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for formulary management.

18.2.4.18
CORE
Cold Chain Assurance Protocol 2.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of pharmacy services operational records confirms that cold chain assurance protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

18.3.3.21Prescription Verification Protocol 3.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Pharmacy Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for prescription verification.

18.3.4.22Formulary Management Protocol 3.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of pharmacy services operational records confirms that formulary management protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

18.4.2.24High-Alert Drug Storage Protocol 4.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Pharmacy Services substantiate consistent execution of high-alert drug storage workflows across clinical shifts.

19.1.1.11Diagnostic Radiation Safety Protocol 1.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Diagnostic Imaging Services verifies full compliance with diagnostic radiation safety requirements and active supervisory oversight.

19.1.2.12Imaging Turnaround Time Protocol 1.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Diagnostic Imaging Services substantiate consistent execution of imaging turnaround time workflows across clinical shifts.

19.1.3.13Contrast Administration Protocol 1.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Diagnostic Imaging Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for contrast administration.

19.2.1.15PACS Archival Protocol 2.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Diagnostic Imaging Services verifies full compliance with pacs archival requirements and active supervisory oversight.

19.2.2.16Diagnostic Radiation Safety Protocol 2.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Diagnostic Imaging Services substantiate consistent execution of diagnostic radiation safety workflows across clinical shifts.

19.2.4.18Contrast Administration Protocol 2.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of diagnostic imaging services operational records confirms that contrast administration protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

19.3.2.20PACS Archival Protocol 3.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Diagnostic Imaging Services substantiate consistent execution of pacs archival workflows across clinical shifts.

19.3.4.22Imaging Turnaround Time Protocol 3.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of diagnostic imaging services operational records confirms that imaging turnaround time protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

19.4.1.23Contrast Administration Protocol 4.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Diagnostic Imaging Services verifies full compliance with contrast administration requirements and active supervisory oversight.

19.4.2.24Image Quality Assurance Protocol 4.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Diagnostic Imaging Services substantiate consistent execution of image quality assurance workflows across clinical shifts.

20.1.1.11Laboratory Specimen Reception Protocol 1.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Pathology and Clinical Laboratory Services verifies full compliance with laboratory specimen reception requirements and active supervisory oversight.

20.1.4.14Critical Value Notification Protocol 1.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of pathology and clinical laboratory services operational records confirms that critical value notification protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

20.2.1.15Blood Bank Compatibility Protocol 2.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Pathology and Clinical Laboratory Services verifies full compliance with blood bank compatibility requirements and active supervisory oversight.

20.2.2.16Laboratory Specimen Reception Protocol 2.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Pathology and Clinical Laboratory Services substantiate consistent execution of laboratory specimen reception workflows across clinical shifts.

20.2.3.17Internal Quality Control Protocol 2.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Pathology and Clinical Laboratory Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for internal quality control.

20.3.1.19Critical Value Notification Protocol 3.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Pathology and Clinical Laboratory Services verifies full compliance with critical value notification requirements and active supervisory oversight.

20.3.3.21Laboratory Specimen Reception Protocol 3.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Pathology and Clinical Laboratory Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for laboratory specimen reception.

20.3.4.22Internal Quality Control Protocol 3.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of pathology and clinical laboratory services operational records confirms that internal quality control protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

20.4.1.23External Quality Assessment Protocol 4.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Pathology and Clinical Laboratory Services verifies full compliance with external quality assessment requirements and active supervisory oversight.

20.4.2.24Critical Value Notification Protocol 4.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Pathology and Clinical Laboratory Services substantiate consistent execution of critical value notification workflows across clinical shifts.

21.1.1.11Infectious Linen Segregation Protocol 1.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Linen and Laundry Services verifies full compliance with infectious linen segregation requirements and active supervisory oversight.

21.1.2.12Thermal Disinfection Washing Protocol 1.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Linen and Laundry Services substantiate consistent execution of thermal disinfection washing workflows across clinical shifts.

21.1.3.13Clean Linen Transport Protocol 1.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Linen and Laundry Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for clean linen transport.

21.1.4.14Textile Integrity Audit Protocol 1.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of linen and laundry services operational records confirms that textile integrity audit protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

21.2.1.15Linen Barrier Control Protocol 2.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Linen and Laundry Services verifies full compliance with linen barrier control requirements and active supervisory oversight.

21.2.2.16Infectious Linen Segregation Protocol 2.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Linen and Laundry Services substantiate consistent execution of infectious linen segregation workflows across clinical shifts.

21.2.4.18Clean Linen Transport Protocol 2.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of linen and laundry services operational records confirms that clean linen transport protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

21.3.2.20Linen Barrier Control Protocol 3.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Linen and Laundry Services substantiate consistent execution of linen barrier control workflows across clinical shifts.

21.3.4.22
CORE
Thermal Disinfection Washing Protocol 3.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of linen and laundry services operational records confirms that thermal disinfection washing protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

21.4.1.23Clean Linen Transport Protocol 4.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Linen and Laundry Services verifies full compliance with clean linen transport requirements and active supervisory oversight.

21.4.2.24Textile Integrity Audit Protocol 4.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Linen and Laundry Services substantiate consistent execution of textile integrity audit workflows across clinical shifts.

22.1.1.11Colour-Coded Cleaning Protocol 1.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Housekeeping and Cleaning Services verifies full compliance with colour-coded cleaning requirements and active supervisory oversight.

22.1.2.12Disinfectant Dilution Protocol 1.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Housekeeping and Cleaning Services substantiate consistent execution of disinfectant dilution workflows across clinical shifts.

22.1.3.13Terminal Ward Discharge Protocol 1.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Housekeeping and Cleaning Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for terminal ward discharge.

22.2.2.16Colour-Coded Cleaning Protocol 2.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Housekeeping and Cleaning Services substantiate consistent execution of colour-coded cleaning workflows across clinical shifts.

22.2.4.18Terminal Ward Discharge Protocol 2.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of housekeeping and cleaning services operational records confirms that terminal ward discharge protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

22.3.1.19Biohazard Clean-up Protocol 3.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Housekeeping and Cleaning Services verifies full compliance with biohazard clean-up requirements and active supervisory oversight.

22.3.2.20Sanitation Inspection Protocol 3.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Housekeeping and Cleaning Services substantiate consistent execution of sanitation inspection workflows across clinical shifts.

22.3.3.21Colour-Coded Cleaning Protocol 3.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Housekeeping and Cleaning Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for colour-coded cleaning.

22.3.4.22Disinfectant Dilution Protocol 3.4
Low Risk
Self: na → Surv: na

Departmental scope verification confirms that disinfectant dilution is not applicable to the operational services provided by Housekeeping and Cleaning Services at this facility.

22.4.2.24Biohazard Clean-up Protocol 4.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Housekeeping and Cleaning Services substantiate consistent execution of biohazard clean-up workflows across clinical shifts.

23A.1.2.12Cold Room Temperature Control Protocol 1.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Mortuary Services substantiate consistent execution of cold room temperature control workflows across clinical shifts.

Standard 23AOpen Split Ledger
23A.1.3.13Chain of Custody Protocol 1.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Mortuary Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for chain of custody.

Standard 23AOpen Split Ledger
23A.1.4.14Infectious Remains Handling Protocol 1.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of mortuary services operational records confirms that infectious remains handling protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

Standard 23AOpen Split Ledger
23A.2.2.16Deceased Identification Protocol 2.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Mortuary Services substantiate consistent execution of deceased identification workflows across clinical shifts.

Standard 23AOpen Split Ledger
23A.2.3.17
CORE
Cold Room Temperature Control Protocol 2.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Mortuary Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for cold room temperature control.

Standard 23AOpen Split Ledger
23A.2.4.18Chain of Custody Protocol 2.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of mortuary services operational records confirms that chain of custody protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

Standard 23AOpen Split Ledger
23A.3.1.19Infectious Remains Handling Protocol 3.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Mortuary Services verifies full compliance with infectious remains handling requirements and active supervisory oversight.

Standard 23AOpen Split Ledger
23A.3.2.20Bereavement Support Protocol 3.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Mortuary Services substantiate consistent execution of bereavement support workflows across clinical shifts.

Standard 23AOpen Split Ledger
23A.3.3.21Deceased Identification Protocol 3.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Mortuary Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for deceased identification.

Standard 23AOpen Split Ledger
23A.3.4.22Cold Room Temperature Control Protocol 3.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of mortuary services operational records confirms that cold room temperature control protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

Standard 23AOpen Split Ledger
23A.4.1.23Chain of Custody Protocol 4.1
Low Risk
Self: na → Surv: na

Departmental scope verification confirms that chain of custody is not applicable to the operational services provided by Mortuary Services at this facility.

Standard 23AOpen Split Ledger
24.1.1.11Hospital Administration Protocol 1.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in General Administration and Support Services verifies full compliance with hospital administration requirements and active supervisory oversight.

24.1.2.12Contractor Management Protocol 1.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in General Administration and Support Services substantiate consistent execution of contractor management workflows across clinical shifts.

24.1.3.13Procurement Oversight Protocol 1.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of General Administration and Support Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for procurement oversight.

24.1.4.14Transport Logistics Protocol 1.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of general administration and support services operational records confirms that transport logistics protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

24.2.1.15Security Surveillance Protocol 2.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in General Administration and Support Services verifies full compliance with security surveillance requirements and active supervisory oversight.

24.2.2.16Hospital Administration Protocol 2.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in General Administration and Support Services substantiate consistent execution of hospital administration workflows across clinical shifts.

24.2.3.17Contractor Management Protocol 2.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of General Administration and Support Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for contractor management.

24.2.4.18Procurement Oversight Protocol 2.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of general administration and support services operational records confirms that procurement oversight protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

24.3.1.19Transport Logistics Protocol 3.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in General Administration and Support Services verifies full compliance with transport logistics requirements and active supervisory oversight.

24.3.2.20Security Surveillance Protocol 3.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in General Administration and Support Services substantiate consistent execution of security surveillance workflows across clinical shifts.

24.3.3.21Hospital Administration Protocol 3.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of General Administration and Support Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for hospital administration.

24.3.4.22Contractor Management Protocol 3.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of general administration and support services operational records confirms that contractor management protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

24.4.2.24Transport Logistics Protocol 4.2
Low Risk
Self: na → Surv: na

Departmental scope verification confirms that transport logistics is not applicable to the operational services provided by General Administration and Support Services at this facility.

25.1.1.11Blood Transfusion Safety Protocol 1.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Blood Transfusion Services verifies full compliance with blood transfusion safety requirements and active supervisory oversight.

25.1.2.12
CORE
Crossmatch Verification Protocol 1.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Blood Transfusion Services substantiate consistent execution of crossmatch verification workflows across clinical shifts.

25.1.3.13Transfusion Reaction Protocol Protocol 1.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Blood Transfusion Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for transfusion reaction protocol.

25.1.4.14Cold Chain Transport Protocol 1.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of blood transfusion services operational records confirms that cold chain transport protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

25.2.1.15Donor Screening Protocol 2.1
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Surveyor sampling of departmental registers in Blood Transfusion Services verifies full compliance with donor screening requirements and active supervisory oversight.

25.2.2.16Blood Transfusion Safety Protocol 2.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Blood Transfusion Services substantiate consistent execution of blood transfusion safety workflows across clinical shifts.

25.2.4.18Transfusion Reaction Protocol Protocol 2.4
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

On-site audit of blood transfusion services operational records confirms that transfusion reaction protocol protocols are implemented with regular documentation and active staff adherence.

25.3.2.20
CORE
Donor Screening Protocol 3.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Blood Transfusion Services substantiate consistent execution of donor screening workflows across clinical shifts.

25.3.3.21
CORE
Blood Transfusion Safety Protocol 3.3
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Inspection of Blood Transfusion Services surveillance logs demonstrates structured quality controls and verified compliance for blood transfusion safety.

25.4.2.24Cold Chain Transport Protocol 4.2
Low Risk
Self: met → Surv: met

Documented records and staff interviews in Blood Transfusion Services substantiate consistent execution of cold chain transport workflows across clinical shifts.

6-Check Survey Consistency Engine

Automated auditing of survey scoring rules, justifications, and indicator alignments.

#1

Core Criteria Assessment Completeness

All mandatory Core criteria must receive committed surveyor ratings.

PASS
#2

Reasoned Basis for Rating Divergences

Every rating downgrade or upgrade against self-assessment requires documented justification.

PASS
#4

Indicator Alignment & Clinical Consistency

Surveyor rating aligns with objective clinical performance indicator zone results.

1 FLAGGED
Affected Criteria:6.1.7
#5

Surveyor Standard Assignment Scope

Ratings committed strictly within surveyors' designated service standard domains.

260 FLAGGED
Affected Criteria:03.1.1.1103.1.2.1203.1.3.1303.1.4.1403.2.1.1503.2.2.1603.2.3.1703.2.4.1803.3.1.1903.3.2.2003.3.3.2103.3.4.2203.4.1.2303.4.2.2403.4.3.2509A.1.1.1109A.1.2.1209A.1.3.1309A.1.4.1409A.2.1.1509A.2.2.1609A.2.3.1709A.2.4.1809A.3.1.1909A.3.2.2009A.3.3.2109A.3.4.2209A.4.1.2309A.4.2.2409A.4.3.2509B.1.1.1109B.1.2.1209B.1.3.1309B.1.4.1409B.2.1.1509B.2.2.1609B.2.3.1709B.2.4.1809B.3.1.1909B.3.2.2009B.3.3.2109B.3.4.2209B.4.1.2309B.4.2.2409B.4.3.2509C.1.1.1109C.1.2.1209C.1.3.1309C.1.4.1409C.2.1.1509C.2.2.1609C.2.3.1709C.2.4.1809C.3.1.1909C.3.2.2009C.3.3.2109C.3.4.2209C.4.1.2309C.4.2.2409C.4.3.2509D.1.1.1109D.1.2.1209D.1.3.1309D.1.4.1409D.2.1.1509D.2.2.1609D.2.3.1709D.2.4.1809D.3.1.1909D.3.2.2009D.3.3.2109D.3.4.2209D.4.1.2309D.4.2.2409D.4.3.2509E.1.1.1109E.1.2.1209E.1.3.1309E.1.4.1409E.2.1.1509E.2.2.1609E.2.3.1709E.2.4.1809E.3.1.1909E.3.2.2009E.3.3.2109E.3.4.2209E.4.1.2309E.4.2.2409E.4.3.2509F.1.1.1109F.1.2.1209F.1.3.1309F.1.4.1409F.2.1.1509F.2.2.1609F.2.3.1709F.2.4.1809F.3.1.1909F.3.2.2009F.3.3.2109F.3.4.2209F.4.1.2309F.4.2.2409F.4.3.2510.1.1.1110.1.2.1210.1.3.1310.1.4.1410.2.1.1510.2.2.1610.2.3.1710.2.4.1810.3.1.1910.3.2.2010.3.3.2110.3.4.2210.4.1.2310.4.2.2410.4.3.2511.1.1.1111.1.2.1211.1.3.1311.1.4.1411.2.1.1511.2.2.1611.2.3.1711.2.4.1811.3.1.1911.3.2.2011.3.3.2111.3.4.2211.4.1.2311.4.2.2412A.1.1.1112A.1.2.1212A.1.3.1312A.1.4.1412A.2.1.1512A.2.2.1612A.2.3.1712A.2.4.1812A.3.1.1912A.3.2.2012A.3.3.2112A.3.4.2212A.4.1.2312A.4.2.2413.1.1.1113.1.2.1213.1.3.1313.1.4.1413.2.1.1513.2.2.1613.2.3.1713.2.4.1813.3.1.1913.3.2.2013.3.3.2113.3.4.2213.4.1.2313.4.2.2414.1.1.1114.1.2.1214.1.3.1314.1.4.1414.2.1.1514.2.2.1614.2.3.1714.2.4.1814.3.1.1914.3.2.2014.3.3.2114.3.4.2214.4.1.2314.4.2.2415.1.1.1115.1.2.1215.1.3.1315.1.4.1415.2.1.1515.2.2.1615.2.3.1715.2.4.1815.3.1.1915.3.2.2015.3.3.2115.3.4.2215.4.1.2315.4.2.2417A.1.1.1117A.1.2.1217A.1.3.1317A.1.4.1417A.2.1.1517A.2.2.1617A.2.3.1717A.2.4.1817A.3.1.1917A.3.2.2017A.3.3.2117A.3.4.2217A.4.1.2317A.4.2.2417B.1.1.1117B.1.2.1217B.1.3.1317B.1.4.1417B.2.1.1517B.2.2.1617B.2.3.1717B.2.4.1817B.3.1.1917B.3.2.2017B.3.3.2117B.3.4.2217B.4.1.2317B.4.2.2420.1.1.1120.1.2.1220.1.3.1320.1.4.1420.2.1.1520.2.2.1620.2.3.1720.2.4.1820.3.1.1920.3.2.2020.3.3.2120.3.4.2220.4.1.2320.4.2.2424.1.1.1124.1.2.1224.1.3.1324.1.4.1424.2.1.1524.2.2.1624.2.3.1724.2.4.1824.3.1.1924.3.2.2024.3.3.2124.3.4.2224.4.1.2324.4.2.2425.1.1.1125.1.2.1225.1.3.1325.1.4.1425.2.1.1525.2.2.1625.2.3.1725.2.4.1825.3.1.1925.3.2.2025.3.3.2125.3.4.2225.4.1.2325.4.2.24
#6

Safety Criterion Sentinel & SIQ Linkage

Safety criteria rated Not Met must link to an active SIQ root cause case file.

PASS